Denying an ARC Request and Handling Work Done Without Approval
architectural-reviewhoa-archoa-boardrule-enforcementgoverning-documents

Denying an ARC Request and Handling Work Done Without Approval

How a board writes an ARC denial that cites the guideline, what Florida and Texas statutes say about the notice, and how to handle exterior work already built without approval.

Doug Wright

An HOA ARC denial is the part of architectural review owners remember. An approval gets filed away; a denial gets read closely, and the letter has to hold up to that reading.

A request the architectural review committee (ARC) has to turn down and a project that went up before anyone asked both need a decision tied to written standards, applied the same way to every owner. If the ARC is still setting up its intake and review routine, start with how to handle HOA architectural review requests. For what the ARC is and where its authority comes from, see what the HOA ARC is and what it controls.

Start the denial with the guideline it cites

A letter that only says the request wasn't approved leaves the owner guessing what to change. A useful denial names the section of the declaration or the architectural guidelines the project doesn't meet, says which part of the project falls short, and, where the ARC can, describes a version it could approve.

That last part matters most to the owner. A denial that points to a workable revision can come back as a resubmission the ARC approves.

Before drafting, read the guideline against the application line by line. If the ARC can't point to written text the project breaks, the denial rests on taste.

A magnifying glass held over a printed page, reading it line by line

Photo by Nothing Ahead on Pexels

Keep the application, drawings, the ARC's vote and the letter together in one dated file, so anyone who opens it later can see what was decided and on what basis.

What Florida requires in a denial notice

Some states put the content of a denial into statute. In Florida, the architectural control statute, section 720.3035, says that when the association or its committee denies a request or application, it must give the owner written notice stating "with specificity" the rule or covenant it relied on and the specific aspect of the proposed improvement that doesn't conform.

The same section requires the association and its committees to apply and enforce architectural standards reasonably and equitably on all parcel owners. If the association or committee unreasonably, knowingly and willfully infringes or impairs an owner's architectural rights under the declaration or authorized guidelines, the owner may recover damages, including costs and reasonable attorney fees.

What Texas requires for larger associations

Texas spells out an appeal process, with limits on who it covers. Texas Property Code section 209.00505 on architectural review authority applies only to a property owners' association with more than 40 lots. It doesn't apply during a development period, or while the declarant appoints or controls the appointment of at least a majority of the architectural review authority or can veto or modify its decisions.

Where it applies, an owner may appeal the architectural review authority's denial to the board. The denial notice goes by certified mail, hand delivery or electronic delivery. It describes the basis for the denial in reasonable detail and the changes, if any, that would bring the application into compliance, and it tells the owner they may request a hearing "on or before the 30th day after the date the notice was mailed to the owner."

If the owner asks, the board holds the hearing within 30 days after receiving the request and gives written notice of the date, time and place at least 10 days before. Only one hearing is required. Either side may ask for a postponement, which is granted for up to 10 days; further postponements need both sides to agree. The association or the owner may make an audio recording of the meeting.

At the hearing, each side may discuss and verify facts and try to resolve the denial. The board may then affirm, modify or reverse the decision, in whole or in part, consistent with the declaration. FindLaw notes that its code pages may not reflect the latest law, so check the current text of the statute before the board relies on it.

Give owners a way to ask again

Where no statute requires an appeal, a written reconsideration route still helps. Some declarations and committee charters set one; your declaration and your state's law decide what applies to your community.

Keep the route short: the owner asks in writing, the board reviews the ARC's decision at a meeting, and the answer goes out in writing. Each denial letter should tell the owner how to ask.

A denial reads better when it states the standard plainly and points to the next step; the guide to communicating an unpopular HOA decision covers the tone.

When the work is already built

Sometimes the ARC learns about a project after the fence is up or the shed is in the backyard. Slow down before sending anything.

Start with the facts. Someone from the ARC looks at the work from the street or the common area, photographs it, notes the date, and checks the file for an application or approval that may have gone astray.

Next, ask whether the project would have been approved. If it meets the guidelines, the simplest route is often an after-the-fact application the ARC reviews like any other request. If it doesn't, the matter moves to the declaration's enforcement provisions, starting with a written notice; the post on what to include in an HOA violation notice covers that letter.

A worker fitting a solar panel on the roof of a house

Photo by Kindel Media on Pexels

Work that has stood for years, or went up under older guidelines, raises a grandfather question that the documents and your state's law answer; check both before acting.

Keep any remedy to what the declaration's enforcement provisions allow. Asking an owner to remove finished work is the most serious step, so have the association's attorney look at the file before the board makes that request.

Check the decision against past ones

Before a denial or violation notice goes out, pull the ARC's earlier decisions on similar projects. If neighbors have the same fence style approved on file, a denial for one owner is hard to explain.

In Florida, that same statute also says the association may not enforce a policy or restriction inconsistent with an owner's rights under the declaration or authorized guidelines, whether or not it's uniformly applied.

If past approvals drifted from the written guidelines, update the guidelines through the board's normal rule process and apply the new version evenly from then on.

The denial file in HOA-OS

HOA-OS has an ARC committee workflow where the ARC reviews and acts on each homeowner change request, a form builder with 14 field types including file upload and signature, and a submissions inbox that holds new requests and after-the-fact applications alike. For work built without approval, violation tracking recommends the CC&R clause that likely applies and a notice template the board completes. Document storage holds the declaration and the guidelines the letter cites.

Sources

Related Reading

One question settles whether a denial is ready to send: which written standard does this project fail, and what change would earn it approval?